Epsilon Eridani was a magic name in my childhood, so convinced was I that the nearby star (10.5 light years from Earth) was orbited by planets. Now the Hubble Space Telescope has weighed in with definitive evidence for the existence of at least one of those worlds, a Jupiter-class gas giant in a 6.9 year orbit around the star. The planet was originally detected in 2000 by radial velocity measurements, but there was still the faint possibility that turbulence on the star itself might mimic a planet's effects. Now we know that wasn't so. G. Fritz Benedict and Barbara McArthur (University of Texas at Austin) led the team that announced the result. Those stellar wobbles tell an unmistakable story when observed over time. Here's Benedict on the matter: "You can't see the wobble induced by the planet with the naked eye. But Hubble's fine guidance sensors are so precise that they can measure the wobble. We basically watched three years of a nearly seven-year-long dance of the star and its...
Reconsidering SETI and the Drake Equation
Frank Drake's famous equation, first outlined at the Green Bank Conference in 1961, tries to estimate the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communications might be possible. Such attempts are obviously speculative, but Drake concentrated on factors like the number of habitable planets, the fraction of those that contain life, and the fraction of those on which civilizations eventually appear. The equation in its entirety looks like this: Here, N is the number of civilizations with communications potential in the galaxy, with R* the rate of star formation, fp the fraction of stars with planets, ne the number of planets that can support life per system, fl the fraction of planets that develop life, fi the fraction that develop intelligent life, fc the fraction that go on to communicate and L the life time of a technological civilization. Zsolt Hetesi and Zsolt Regály (Eötvös University, Budapest) discuss the kind of civilizations that may emerge in a recent paper. As far...
For the Weekend: Great Physicists Speak
I see that Stephen Hawking has a new book under contract. The Grand Design is to be co-authored by Leonard Mlodinow, who also worked with Hawking on A Briefer History of Time. This one takes on an issue that is challenging even for Hawking, namely the question of why the laws of physics act as they do and, if a Bantam Dell publisher is to be believed, the question of why there is a universe in the first place. Meanwhile, Hawking spent the week of September 24 to October 1 visiting CERN in Geneva, meeting with physicists in the Theory Unit of the Physics Department there and touring the facilities of the Large Hadron Collider, due to be started up in 2007. Note that two Hawking lectures are now available over the Web, one of which, titled The Origin of the Universe, anticipates the new book. The other, The Semi-Classical Birth of the Universe, is aimed at a specialist audience. And one other note apropos of great physicists for an otherwise quiet weekend. The BBC offers a 1981...
Can Red Dwarfs Support Living Worlds?
Centauri Dreams has often discussed red dwarf stars and the question of habitability. This time let's focus in on a nearby candidate called AU Mic, an M-class dwarf some 10 parsecs (roughly 32 light years) from Earth. At twelve million years old, this is one of the nearest young dwarfs, and it's known to possess a dusty debris disk. In fact, what we see around AU Mic looks like the late stages of planet formation, with planet-sized objects disturbing smaller disk materials and creating something like our own Kuiper Belt. The lesson of AU Mic seems clear: planet formation around M-class dwarfs is probably common, even though we see few debris disks around older stars of this class. That may simply be the result of the sensitivity of our search technologies, and in any case the smallest exoplanets we've yet found orbiting main sequence stars orbit red dwarfs (consider the rocky world around Gliese 876). Let's be clear on this: we're likely to get solid confirmation of smaller,...
A Nearby Supernova and the Birth of the Sun
I've always had a passion for origins, which is why I once pondered a career in paleontology. The idea of working at an excavation where I could examine the remains of things that had lived hundreds of millions of years ago was galvanizing, and I read deeply into what we knew about the planet's earliest creatures. Later, understanding that the most distant objects we see are also the oldest, I transferred that passion for origins into an interest in cosmology. So a recent finding out of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is heady stuff indeed. There, astonomers Leslie Looney, Brian Fields and a sharp undergraduate named John Tobin have been studying the birth of our Sun by looking at the descendants -- 'daughter species' -- of the short-lived radioactive isotopes found in early meteorites. The isotopes themselves are created in supernova explosions; they become mixed with the nebular gas and dust that will eventually condense into stars, planets and debris like...
Planets in the Galactic Bulge
"Hot Jupiters?" read a recent e-mail. "Who cares about hot Jupiters? What I'm after are planets like Earth, rocky terrestrial worlds." My correspondent probably feels the same way today, after NASA's announcement of sixteen new extrasolar planet candidates, all of which fall into the hot Jupiter category and some into an even more bizarre niche -- Ultra-Short-Period Planets, or USPPs. One of these star-hugging worlds, called SWEEPS-10, orbits its parent star once every ten hours. But not so fast. Sure, getting those first terrestrial world detections, presumably through the transit method, is going to be phenomenal, but the steps leading up to that breakthrough are hugely significant. The results announced today didn't involve nearby stars but were focused on 180,000 stars in the Milky Way's central bulge, fully 26,000 light years from Earth. And what can be extrapolated from these sixteen planets is that planet-formation isn't a local phenomenon limited to regions out in the spiral...
O Stars: The Perils of Proximity
We've recently looked at the effects of massive stars on the debris disks surrounding them. Now the Spitzer Space Telescope has shed new light on just how problematic such environments can be. The huge O-type stars studied by a team of scientists from the University of Arizona's Steward Observatory (Tucson) are pouring ultraviolet light and powerful solar winds into the protoplanetary disks around Sun-like stars that have the misfortune of being too near to them. The result: Disruption of the disk through a process called photoevaporation. An O star can be as much as 100 times more massive than the Sun, able to heat a nearby star's disk to the point that gas and dust boil off. With the disk unable to hold together, the evaporated material is eventually blown away by solar winds. The result creates what researchers are calling a 'cometary structure' -- the photoevaporation that causes it is something like what happens when a comet forms its tail in its swing through the inner solar...
How Far a Frontier?
When is a space mission too expensive to fly? It's a question much in the mind of proponents of robotic exploration, who can point to lower cost as one excellent reason to leave human crews out of our deep space missions. But robotic missions can suffer the same fate as human ones, with technology advances like miniaturization exploited not to pack more instruments on board but to reduce costs. Faster, cheaper, better, but bureaucratic inefficiencies can trump the savings. Giancarlo Genta (Politecnico di Torino) offers up an interesting perspective on the cost question. In a keynote he delivered last year at the Fourth IAA Symposium on Realistic Near-Term Advanced Scientific Space Missions in Aosta, Italy, Genta compared the cost of space missions to other public enterprises like the construction of motorways or infrastructure projects like Alpine tunnels. In that light, the notion that space missions are unbearably costly is simply false. And he goes on to say this: The same if we...