Just how different were things in the early universe? One answer comes from a study of galaxies whose light has taken eleven billion years to reach us. In this early era -- the universe would have been less than three billion years old -- researchers have found galaxies so unusually compact that they compress a galaxy's worth of stars into a space only five thousand light years across. Such objects would be able to fit into the central hub of the Milky Way. What's more, these ultra-dense galaxies may account for as much as half the number of all galaxies of their mass that existed at this time. "In the Hubble Deep Field, astronomers found that star-forming galaxies are small," said Marijn Franx of Leiden University, The Netherlands. "However, these galaxies were also very low in mass. They weigh much less than our Milky Way. Our study, which surveyed a much larger area than in the Hubble Deep Field, surprisingly shows that galaxies with the same weight as our Milky Way were also very...
The ‘Great Filter’ Tackles Fermi
Suppose for a moment that life really is rare in the universe. That when we are able to investigate the nearby stars in detail, we not only discover no civilizations but few living things of any kind. If all the elements for producing life are there, is there some kind of filter that prevents it from proceeding into advanced and intelligent stages that use artifacts, write poetry and build von Neumann probes to explore the stars? Nick Bostrom discusses the question in an article in Technology Review, with implications for our understanding of the past and future of civilization. Choke Points in the Past Maybe intelligent beings bring about their own downfall, a premise that takes in more than the collapse of a single society. Alaric's Goths took Rome in 410, hastening the decline of a once great empire, but the devastated period that followed saw Europe gradually re-build into the Renaissance. And as Bostrom notes, while a thousand years may seem like a long time to an individual,...
Surface Oceans Around Distant Stars
Would large amounts of water on the surface provide a glint of light in both the infrared and visible spectrum if we study a distant exoplanet long enough? That's the premise of an investigation now in progress, one aiming to find Earth-like planets in the habitable zone of a star. Darren Williams (Penn State Erie) and Eric Gaidos (University of Hawaii) have something more in mind than analyzing a planetary atmosphere for signs of water. They want to spot planets with water on the surface. If the goal sounds chimerical now, bear in mind that various planet-hunting missions like Terrestrial Planet Finder (in its various incarnations) and Darwin are being designed to allow direct observation of planets as small as the Earth. Such observatories, which may be in place within two decades or less, could also examine the visible and infrared light curve of such planets over the course of an entire orbit. "We are going to look at the planets for a long time," says Williams. "They reflect one...
Dark Matter: Flashes Beneath the Earth
Dark matter is interesting in its own right, a mysterious 'something' that according to WMAP data must account for 23 percent of the universe (the breakdown now thought to be 72 percent dark energy, 23 percent dark matter, 4.6 percent atoms and less than 1 percent neutrinos). From a propulsion standpoint, dark matter intrigues us because it may represent a reaction mass conceivably useful for future space flight. It's also Nobel Prize territory for the team that identifies it, which is why so many teams are looking, with one team's provocative results drawing criticism. The Italian and Chinese physicists on the DAMA Project have held out since 2000 for their claim that they are detecting dark matter beneath the Gran Sasso mountain in Italy. The modulation is yearly and could represent the Earth's motion through a dark matter stream as it orbits the Sun. The larger DAMA/LIBRA experiment now reaffirms the phenomenon, which appears as flashes in the team's sodium iodide detector. With...
Down and Dirty in the Data
astroENGINE.com hosts the 51st Carnival of Space, a lengthy compilation indeed, from which I'll draw Ian Musgrave's interesting post on a possible transit at 83 Leonis as the feature of the week. If you want to find out what it's like to get your hands dirty juggling the data, trying to sift out signal from noise and working with all the imponderables that go into spotting the signature of a transiting world, have a look. Ian finds a noisy 83 Leonis but one that just might show a transit. A self-described 'mathematically challenged biologist,' this is a writer whose work is always worth watching. In this case, what he's doing reflects the broadening participation of amateurs in exoplanet projects, an idea Greg Laughlin has championed, so it's no surprise to see that Ian has drawn from Laughlin's expertise in his current work.
Degrees of Visibility
Alexander Zaitsev's latest contribution to the debate over sending messages to the stars is a short paper that looks at how visible our planet might be thanks to transmissions from planetary radars like Arecibo, Goldstone or the Evpatoria site from which directed transmissions have already been sent. METI (Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) is broadly dedicated to transmitting messages to stars likely to have habitable planets, but so far the number of transmissions is relatively sparse. The debate over METI discusses the wisdom of continuing them without broader discussion. But tucked within that debate is the specific question of our civilization's visibility. For in addition to the messages that have already been sent, beginning with the Arecibo message in 1974 and continuing in the far more targeted transmissions from Evpatoria between 1999 and 2003, we are using our planetary radars to perform crucial astronomical studies. The work these dishes do in refining our...
Electric Sails: Leave the Propellant at Home
A Finnish design making the news recently is hardly the only concept for near-term space sailing, but the possibility of testing it in space for a relatively small sum of money is attractive. This is especially true at a time when strapped budgets like NASA's are focused on ratcheting up conventional propulsion techniques to get us back to the Moon and on to Mars. Yes, let's keep pushing outward into nearby space with what we've got, but we need next-generation thinking, too, and the Finnish sail, the work of Pekka Janhunen and Arto Sandroos, points in that direction. Unlike magnetic sails that create an artificial magnetosphere around the spacecraft, the Finnish concept is to use long, thin conductive wires that are kept at a positive potential through the use of an onboard electron gun. The two researchers considered how the charged particles of the solar wind would interact with a single charged wire in a 2007 paper that we looked at in this Centauri Dreams article just over a...
Hawking and the Long Result
Sometimes it's hard to believe that Stephen Hawking is only sixty-six. Not just because of his indomitable fight against Lou Gehrig's disease, which is a story in its own right, but because his position at the summit of modern physics has kept him in the public eye for an exceedingly long time. Now, in a speech commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of NASA, Hawking has taken aim at the question of why space matters. And it's not surprising that this Star Trek fan quoted his favorite show. "If the human race is to continue for another million years, we will have to boldly go where no one has gone before ... It will not solve any of our immediate problems on planet Earth, but it will give us a new perspective on them and... Hopefully, it will unite us to face a common challenge." But of course, that question of solving our immediate problems on Earth is what is often subject to debate. Although the space budget is usually overestimated (a recent conversation illustrated this, a friend...
A ‘Hot Jupiter’ in Our Solar System?
Serendipity is a wondrous thing. Start writing about the early history of the Solar System, as I intended to do yesterday, and you wind up discussing 'hot Jupiters' around other stars. But there actually is a bridge between the two concepts, and it comes in the form of a question. If we find gas giants in scorchingly hot orbits around other stars, why was there no hot Jupiter in our own Solar System? Or was there? That question was what originally led me to the paper by Avi Mandell, Sean Raymond and Stein Sigurðsson that occupied yesterday's post. For in their analysis of how giant planets migrate through an early planetary system, wreaking havoc on newly forming worlds but also scattering them interestingly throughout nearby space, these researchers paused to examine the implications of these studies for our own system. Having demonstrated through their simulations that the migration of a gas giant through an inner system may be common, and that systems that experience it often form...
Habitable Worlds and Hot Jupiters
What happens to potentially habitable planets when a gas giant swings through the neighborhood? It's a pertinent question when you consider the surprises that 'hot Jupiters' have given us. 22 percent of known extrasolar planets show an orbital radius of less than 0.1 AU, and 16 percent are located within 0.05 AU of their host star. That's a surprise given the assumption that these gas giant planets must form much further out in their systems, but it can be explained by inward migration of the giant planet, a process under much study that is generally thought to be caused by interactions with the protoplanetary disk. Such a migration would seem to spell trouble for planets already orbiting closer to the star, leading some to believe that systems with hot Jupiters are unlikely homes for living worlds. But recent simulations of the growth of such systems make it clear that a hot Jupiter isn't necessarily a deal-breaker for habitable worlds. Are we going to have to add such systems into...
Weekend Reading from Triton to Kentucky
The Kentucky space program may get back to the Moon before NASA or the Chinese. If that sounds cryptic, do visit the latest Carnival of Space, held on Wayne Hall's KySat Online site, which supports this innovative and student-led program to get the educational system into the business of designing, building, and operating small satellites. Wayne writes: The very first project of this ambitious enterprise is a cooperative, student-led effort to design, build and fly a CubeSat that kids from the eastern mountains to the western Mississippi river shore can figuratively reach out and touch from classrooms all over the state. The first of many planned efforts, it will rocket to orbit sometime late this year or early next. Good fortune accompany the attempt! I hope many states are watching what Kentucky is doing, an educational activity that spreads interest and enthusiasm for space projects to the next generation of scientists. As to the Carnival itself, I normally choose one post of...
Star Formation in the Hinterlands
Centauri Dreams always thinks it's important to talk about images like the one below. Not the specific subject matter -- this is the Southern Pinwheel galaxy M83, about which more in a moment -- but about the beauty of the image. Casual browsers of astronomy photos often tell me they never realized how colorful space actually is, which is why I want to say periodically that images like these are doctored to reveal information. In this case, far-ultraviolet light is intentionally shown in blue, near-ultraviolet light in green, and radio emissions -- at the 21 centimeter wavelength of gaseous hydrogen -- are shown in red. Space is undoubtedly beautiful, but what you see in many of these photos is not what you would get if you were there. In fact, not only are the colors doctored here, but this is a composite image, incorporating observations from the Very Large Array and the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX), an orbiting ultraviolet survey telescope. Image: The outlying regions around...
Bach’s Flare: Brightening the Galactic Core
Looking at the central black holes in galaxies other than our own has forced a question: What's going at Milky Way galactic central? We know there is a black hole there, and a big one, weighing in at about four million solar masses. But the Milky Way's black hole, called Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'A-star') seems quiet compared to what we see in other galaxies, emitting but a trace of the radiation they are pushing into the cosmos. A new study from a Japanese team proposes an answer. Three hundred years ago, Sgr A* put out a huge flare, making it a million times brighter than today. Today's quiet black hole may simply be the slumbering aftermath of what must have been a frenetic round of activity. "We have wondered why the Milky Way's black hole appears to be a slumbering giant," says team leader Tatsuya Inui of Kyoto University in Japan. "But now we realize that the black hole was far more active in the past. Perhaps it's just resting after a major outburst." Figuring out this...
Ringing the Stellar Bell
56 light years from Earth, the star Iota Horologii is a member of the 'Hyades stream,' a number of stars moving in a similar direction with respect to the rest of the galaxy. It's also an exoplanet host star, known to have a planet twice the mass of Jupiter in a 320-day orbit. The two factors -- the position of the star within the stream and the planet that accompanies it -- play into an unusual application of asteroseismology, the study of the sound waves that move through a star. I want to note this work particularly because it has a bearing on planet formation, about which the more we learn the better as we continue the hunt for exoplanets. But let's pause on asteroseismology itself. You may recall that using this technique for studying the interiors of stars is one of the purposes of the COROT mission, the other being the detection of planetary transits. Asteroseismology is invariably explained with musical metaphors, likening the sound moving within a star to the ringing of a...
John Wheeler and the Umpires
Is observation critical to existence? Niels Bohr believed that it was the collapse of the wave function that gave particles like electrons their distinct reality. John Wheeler, who knew and worked with the great figures of quantum mechanics, summarized the gap between that point of view and Einstein's by quoting three baseball umpires: Number 1: I calls 'em like I see 'em. Number 2: I calls 'em the way they are. Number 3: They ain't nothing till I calls 'em. Michio Kaku reports this story in his book Parallel Worlds, noting this: "To Wheeler, the second umpire is Einstein,who believed there was an absolute reality outside human experience. Einstein called this 'objective reality,' the idea that objects can exist in definite states without human intervention. The third umpire is Bohr, who argued that reality existed only after an observation was made." Image: Albert Einstein, Hideki Yukawa and John A. Wheeler. Credit: Johns Hopkins University. Out of such conundrums John Wheeler made...
Calls Into the Cosmos
Larry Klaes tackles the METI question -- do we intentionally broadcast to the stars? -- in Athena Andreadis' Astrogator's Logs today, looking at the pros and cons of an issue that continues to bedevil the scientific community. Of METI advocate Alexander Zaitsev (Russian Academy of Science), for example, Klaes writes this: In a paper Zaitsev published in 2006, the scientist notes that "SETI is meaningless if no one feels the need to transmit." Zaitsev also feels that if there are advanced cultures bent on harming humanity, they will find us eventually, so it is in our best interests to seek them out first. Zaitsev sees the great distances between stars and the physical limits imposed by attempting to attain light speed serve as a natural protective barrier for our species and any other potentially vulnerable beings in the galaxy. David Brin among others takes the other side of the debate in an article tuned for newcomers to these issues. And that's an important audience. Most...
Massive Gamma Ray Burst Still Lingers
The death of a star fifty times more massive than our Sun may well result in a hypernova, far more powerful than a supernova and, if you're in line with the concentrated beam of its energies, far more luminous. Such events are hypothesized to be associated with long-duration gamma ray bursts (GRBs). We've just had a spectacular example of an apparent hypernova/GRB combination in the form of GRB 080319B, the record-holder for brightest naked eye object ever seen from Earth. The image shows the fading light of this event as seen by the Hubble spacecraft on April 7. Bear in mind that the flash of gamma rays and other radiation was detected on March 19, at which point the GRB could be viewed at 5th magnitude in the constellation Boötes. The kicker is that a full three weeks after the explosion, the light of the galaxy in which this event originated is still drowned out by the light of the GRB. Image: The gamma ray burst GRB 080319B leaves us with an optical remnant and a puzzle. What...
Sizing Up Impacts and Their Effects
Do we have a good idea how many impact events have affected life on Earth? New work on ocean sediments offers the chance to expand our knowledge, helping to flag the distinctive signature of an impact and even to tell us how large the incoming object was. We may find more historical impacts than have previously been identified, reminding us yet again that our habitable zone is an active and sometimes dangerous place to be. True, the issues involved in mass extinctions are complicated, but major impacts clearly played a role in some, including the death of the dinosaurs. François Paquay and team estimate the impactor that struck 65 million years ago at the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary was between four and six kilometers in diameter. While other factors, including volcanism, can't be ruled out, the meteorite certainly didn't help matters. Paquay (University of Hawaii at Manoa) analyzed samples of ocean sediments to study osmium levels therein. The element is useful because, as...
Weekend Readings and Rationales
The 49th Carnival of Space is up at Will Gater's site, and this week I'll point you in particular to Alan Boyle's entry on black hole simulations. The mathematics of black hole collisions are not for the faint of heart, but the Rochester Institute of Technology's supercomputer cluster seems up to the task, even if the work demanded a week to complete. Interesting stuff, as an actual triple black hole collision as simulated here should generate gravity waves of the sort being sought by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO). But LIGO scientists need to know what to look for amidst the incoming tsunami of data, which is where supercomputer modeling comes into play. Boyle's presentation of this work is thorough and, as always, admirably clear. There are actually not one but two space carnivals at play this week, the other being Fraser Cain's at Universe Today. But rather than drawing on already written weblog entries, Fraser solicited comments from bloggers on a...
Life as Rarity in the Cosmos
Although I suspect that intelligent life is rare in the cosmos, I'm playing little more than a hunch. So it's interesting to see that Andrew Watson (University of East Anglia) has analyzed the chances for intelligence elsewhere in the universe by looking at the challenges life faced as it evolved. Watson believes that it took specific major steps for an intelligent civilization to develop on Earth, one of which, interestingly enough, is language. Identifying which steps are critical is tricky, but in the aggregate they reduce the chance of intelligence elsewhere. A linguist at heart, I wasn't surprised with the notion that the introduction of language marks a crucial transition as intelligence develops. But what are the other steps, and how do they feed into the possibility of life elsewhere? These interesting questions relate to how long the biosphere will be tenable for life as we know it. If, as was thought until relatively recently, Earth might support life for another five...