The Voyager spacecraft have run into their share of problems as they move toward true interstellar space, but on the whole their continued operations have been a testament to what well designed equipment can do. Voyager 2's camera platform locked for a time not long after the Saturn flyby but controllers were able to restore the system by experimenting with similar actuators on Earth. Three years ago the craft began having data problems resulting from a flipped bit in an onboard computer but a reset from Earth corrected the fault. Even the failure of the primary radio receiver not long after launch was resolved by the use of the onboard backup. Obviously both craft are living on borrowed time as the power output of their radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) continues to decline, but we should still be getting signals for another decade or so. With the Voyagers now on what is designated their 'interstellar mission,' it's pleasing to note that Alpha Centauri is the guide star...

Konstantin Tsiolkovsky is the first person I know of to talk about worldships and their ramifications, which he did in an essay originally published in 1928. "The Future of Earth and Mankind" was the rocket pioneer's take on the need for enormous ships that could reach the stars in journeys taking thousands of years. The notion percolated quickly through science fiction, and by 1940 we have Don Wilcox's "The Voyage that Lasted 600 Years," which ran in Amazing Stories. Wilcox, who taught creative writing at Northwestern University, imagined a ship's captain who, though kept in hibernation, wakes up every 100 years to check on his ship, watching the gradual degeneration of the successive generations of the crew. It's a bleak take on worldship travel that has often been echoed in later science fiction. But would a worldship actually be this horrific, a cruise from hell that lasted entire lifetimes? See Ken MacLeod's Learning the World: A Novel of First Contact (2005) for the worldship...

If humans go out into the Solar System and beyond drawing on the resources they find along the way, they don't necessarily have to do it on worldships of the kind we talked about yesterday. But it's a reasonable assumption that creating large space habitats would make engineering projects in deep space easier to implement, housing workers and providing a base for operations. Ken Roy presented ideas about habitats in the Kuiper Belt at Huntsville, including the possibility of a large colony being created inside objects like Pluto. If we choose to go that route, we'll have the kind of space expertise to create artificial objects similar to worldships to help ourselves along. Of course, we hardly need to limit ourselves to the Kuiper Belt for this kind of thinking. Whatever the design of the ships we use, we can also consider expansion into the vast cometary resources of the Oort Cloud and any other objects that may lurk there, including so-called rogue planets. For years we've kicked...

Existential risks, as discussed here yesterday, seem to be all around us, from the dangers of large impactors to technologies running out of control and super-volcanoes that can cripple our civilization. We humans tend to defer thinking on large-scale risks while tightly focusing on personal risk. Even the recent events near Chelyabinsk, while highlighting the potential danger of falling objects, also produced a lot of fatalistic commentary, on the lines of 'if it's going to happen, there's nothing we can do about it.' Some media outlets did better than others with this. Risk to individuals is understandably more vivid. When Apollo 8 left Earth orbit for the Moon in 1968, the sense of danger was palpable. After all, these astronauts were leaving an orbital regime that we were beginning to understand and were, by the hour, widening the distance between themselves and our planet. But even Apollo 8 operated within a sequenced framework of events. Through Mercury to Gemini and Apollo, we...