The Hera mission has been dwarfed in press coverage by the recent SpaceX Starship booster retrieval and the launch of Europa Clipper, both successful and significant. But let’s not ignore Hera. Its game plan is to check on the asteroid Dimorphos, which became the first body in the Solar System to have its orbit altered by human technologies when the DART spacecraft impacted it in 2022. Hera is all about assessing this double asteroid system to see first-hand the consequences of the impact, which shortened the smaller object’s orbit around asteroid Didymos by some 32 minutes.
That’s a pretty good result, some 25 times what NASA had defined as the minimum successful orbital period change, and we’re learning more about the ejecta, which involve tons of asteroidal rock. The collision occurred at 6.1 kilometers per second, to be more fully assessed by Hera’s twin CubeSat craft, which will make precise measurements of Dimorphos’ mass to analyze the efficiency of the impact. All this factors into planning for asteroid impact missions if an object ever threatens Earth.
Image: Astronomers using the NSF’s NOIRLab’s SOAR telescope in Chile captured the vast plume of dust and debris blasted from the surface of the asteroid Dimorphos by NASA’s DART spacecraft when it impacted on 26 September 2022. In this image, the more than 10,000 kilometer long dust trail — the ejecta that has been pushed away by the Sun’s radiation pressure, not unlike the tail of a comet — can be seen stretching from the center to the right-hand edge of the field of view. Credit: CTIO/NOIRLab/SOAR/NSF/AURA/T. Kareta (Lowell Observatory), M. Knight (US Naval Academy).
I want to draw your attention to those two CubeSats aboard Hera. My thinking is that these miniature spacecraft, built upon standardized 10-cm boxes, are a story as big as the results they’ll gather. There are two of them: Juventas is the product of GOMspace (Luxembourg), designed to make the first radar probe of the interior of an asteroid. Milani was produced by Tyvak International, an Italian operation. Its job is to perform multispectral mineral prospecting. Their recent activation for a check of on-board systems was in both cases completely successful. Says ESA engineer Franco Perez Lissi:
“Each CubeSat was activated for about an hour in turn, in live sessions with the ground to perform commissioning – what we call ‘are you alive?’ and ‘stowed checkout’ tests. The pair are currently stowed within their Deep Space Deployers, but we were able to activate every onboard system in turn, including their platform avionics, instruments and the inter-satellite links they will use to talk to Hera, as well as spinning up and down their reaction wheels which will be employed for attitude control.”
So this is good news for the Hera mission, but in the larger context we are seeing the continuing growth of miniaturized technologies that will improve the efficiency and capability of missions to much more distant targets. Juventas was activated on October 17 at a distance of 4 million kilometers from Earth; Milani’s turn came on October 24, with the craft 7.9 million kilometers out. Both will be deployed from their ‘mothership’ to make close approaches to Dimorphos upon arrival in 2026.
It was back in 2011 that NanoSail-D2 demonstrated successful sail deployment, to be followed by The Planetary Society’s LightSail-a in 2015. We were learning that a spacecraft as small as a CubeSat could carry a solar sail, leading to The Planetary Society’s subsequent LightSail missions. Sara Seager at MIT has investigated CubeSats as exoplanet research platforms, the notion being that a fleet of CubeSats could be deployed with each monitoring a single star. The first detection of an exoplanet by a CubeSat occurred in 2017 with the ASTERIA (Arcsecond Space Telescope Enabling Research In Astrophysics) 6U CubeSat space telescope.
NASA’s Mars Cube One (MarCO) CubeSats demonstrated multiple CubeSat operations beyond Earth orbit in 2018, and there have been a host of CubeSat projects in the hands of private companies and universities ranging from 2009’s AeroCube-3 to LunaH-Map in 2022, the latter aimed at mapping the distribution of hydrogen at the Moon’s south pole. QubeSat is a project out of UC-Berkeley to study quantum gyroscopes in low Earth orbit and explore precision control for small satellite navigation. CubeSats are cheap. Lose one at launch – and early failures abound, as witness Lunar Flashlight – and the impact on your budget is minimized.
Image: The first image captured by one of NASA’s Mars Cube One (MarCO) CubeSats. The image, which shows both the CubeSat’s unfolded high-gain antenna at right and the Earth and its moon in the center, was acquired by MarCO-B on May 9, 2018. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech.
Most CubeSat missions have been designed for low-Earth orbit but some scientists are aiming to go much farther. In a 2023 paper Slava Turyshev (JPL) and colleagues investigated small spacecraft (smallsats) with solar sails in missions to the outer system. In general, a ‘smallsat’ refers to a spacecraft that is both small and lightweight, usually less than 500 kilograms, and sometimes much less, as when we get into the realm of CubeSats.
Smallsats with solar sails are a combination of miniaturization and efficiency, for a sail requires no on-board propellant and can be sent on ‘sundiver’ trajectories that could achieve, in the view of the authors, velocities of 33 kilometers per second (7 AU per year). By comparison, Voyager 1’s pace is 17.1 kilometers per second. Using chemical propulsion, we would need 15 years to reach Uranus, so much faster travel times are welcome.
So let’s add to Sara Seager’s ideas on exoplanet constellations of CubeSats the idea of solar sail smallsats on fast trajectories for flyby missions, impactor missions like DART, and formation and swarm operations at targets like the ice giants, about which we know all too little. The challenge here will be the need for lightweight instrumentation and continuing miniaturization, both trends that seem to be accelerating. Two-years to Jupiter and three to Saturn at these velocities are tantalizing prospects as Turyshev and team continue to study sailcraft designs to reach the Sun’s gravity lens beginning at 550 AU.
How does a fleet of future smallsats hardened for deep space and using modularized components stack up against, say, a single enormous (by comparison) orbiter to Uranus or Neptune? The two could, of course, work together, but given the costs, flyby missions on the cheap in their tens or hundreds could offer priceless scientific return. We always return to the practicalities of prying money out of political entities, so finding ways to lighten the budget while accomplishing the mission will continue to be a priority. Will we see an ice giant orbiter off in the 2030s? Somehow I doubt it.
The exoplanet paper via CubeSat constellation mentioned above is “Demonstrating high-precision photometry with a CubeSat: ASTERIA observations of 55 Cancri e,” The Astronomical Journal Vol. 160, No. 1 (2020), 23 (full text). The Turyshev paper is “Science opportunities with solar sailing smallsats,” Planetary and Space Science Vol. 235 (1 October 2023). Full text. For more on all this, see Building Smallsat Capabilities for the Outer System, published last year in these pages.
A year or so back, I was arguing with Dwayne Day on the SpaceReview about the use of CubeSats for deep space missions. Day was dismissive about their capabilities and ability to achieve such missions. Time seems to be justifying small probes as an alternative to large, expensive ones for some deep space missions- even if the tiny probes have to be delivered by a “truck” to reach their destination before being deployed.
Solar and beamed sail propulsion is very promising. If the basic Breakthrough Starshot idea gains serious traction, I think even tiny gram-scale probe swarms could be very useful. They could certainly quickly catch interstellar objects passing through our system and image them if little else.
Speaking of solar sails, I see that an updated version of “Project Solar Sail” (1993) has been published Project Solar Sail: 21st Century Edition. I am looking forward to reading the new material that has been added.
For flyby missions, a string of cube sats could provide a sort of ‘bullet time’ imaging of the target, each imaging a different aspect as they arrive at a different time. Deploying one cube sat every 24 hours would capture 6 frames of Pluto and create a whole sphere image even at the high speeds of a flyby. It would almost be like going into a single orbit.
Even better, the swarm could also have probes pass over each pole, providing a complete map of the surface. It might even be possible to produce stereoscopic images of the surface to extract elevation using either 2 cameras on a boom, or 2 relatively closely separated CubeSats.
For really deep space communication, i.e. up to 10 AU or beyond, do the CubeSats need a single probe to collect the data for transmission to Earth, or can each have the power to do that?
I’m currently developing designwork and plans for a 16U cubesat to do an in-space test of a Mach Effect MEGAdrive test article, potentially to be launched in 3 years. Given the MEGAdrives in the lab are now generating consistent thrusts of greater than 20 millinewtons per watt and resonant operational thrusts approaching the Newton range (both in vacuum chambers), this technology is approaching a point where it will be feasible for in space use once a few thermal related issues are resolved to allow for more constant thrust.
For the unaware, ion/plasma thrusters generate 1-5 millinewtons per KILOWATT. the SSME generated 35 millinewtons per kilowatt, and a turbine jet engine produces about 250 millinewtons per kilowatt. The Mach Effect technology of the MEGAdrive provides three orders of magnitude more thrust per watt than any other propulsion method. This is a game changer that deserves far more attention and funding than it is getting.
Provided an intial in space demonstration succeeds, this opens the door for probes to reach the outer planets in weeks, Oumuamua in a few months, and potentially even Planet 9 (if it is found around 500 AU out) with a trip time of less than a year with a Voyager class probe under constant thrust with MEGAdrives powered with nothing but the on board RTG power produced (upgrading the old Voyager RTGs with Peltier technology to the new IR PV the latest generation RTGs are implementing), accelerating at as much as 0.07 G.
This allows for the dispersal of thousands of mass produced cubesats for asteroid mineral surveys throughout the asteroid belt, each cubesat able to rendesvous with many asteroids in series given the lack of any limitation imposed by limited propellant.
Equipping SpaceX Starlink sats with this technology will allow their in orbit life span to extend from a mere 5 years to as long as the sats are technologically sufficient for the starlink network which would obviously vastly boost the profitability of Starlink’s network to SpaceX AND allow for a large reduction in internet service fees on the network.
Your blog is a beacon of light in the often murky waters of online content. Your thoughtful analysis and insightful commentary never fail to leave a lasting impression. Keep up the amazing work!
Why thank you, Justen. What a kind remark. Glad to have you as a reader!
source: Unconventional Rocket Drives – Mach Effect [?]
From the above reference:
Given the claimed performance [and Newtons cannot be converted to watts without distance] as stated, if this was true, there would be no question that if there was a strong Mach Effect it would be obvious. AFAIK, this is not the case. This has been going on for more than a decade and nothing has emerged [just like the Shawyer Drive, and other claimed “drives”].
Good luck with your 16U CubeSat demonstrator, but I don’t expect you to announce a propulsion breakthrough anytime in the next decade…or ever.
It would be interesting to hear where people stand on Spinlaunch. Apparently it could launch many cubesats daily, though the articles I found each have some deficiency in how they report the rate. On the other hand, the full working model may need accelerations of “50,000 to 100,000 x g”, with some doubting whether it will be possible for the satellites to withstand this. So… will they transform space exploration?
Sadly, this CubeSat mission was lost:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near-Earth_Asteroid_Scout