What could inflation theory have to do with the Fermi paradox? Quite a lot, if at least one recent paper is to be believed. The question ‘where are they’ about extraterrestrial visitation becomes even more pointed when faster-than-light technologies move out of the realm of the impossible to something that may be seriously investigated by physicists. Inflation theory, which holds that the early universe underwent a vast expansion as spacetime itself stretched far beyond the velocity of light, opens the door to technologies that might use this effect to create spacefaring civilizations spanning entire galaxies.
Just how fast did inflation occur? In a space of time lasting about 10-35 seconds, the universe could have expanded by a factor of 1030 to 10100. As Brian Greene puts it in The Fabric of the Cosmos:
An expansion factor of 1030 — a conservative estimate — would be like scaling up a molecule of DNA to roughly the size of the Milky Way galaxy, and in a time interval that’s much shorter than a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of the blink of an eye… In the many models of inflation in which the calculated expansion factor is much larger than 1030, the resulting spatial expanse is so enormous that the region we are able to see, even with the most powerful telescope possible, is but a tiny fraction of the whole universe.
Enter Bernard Haisch (National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena), Hal Puthoff (Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin) and colleagues. The authors argue in a recent issue of the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society that while General Relativity is valid, there are several approaches within it that may permit bypassing the speed of light limit (even if any civilizations that could build them might have to be more advanced than ours by millions of years):
From the paper:
Clearly when it comes to engineering warp drive or wormhole solutions, seemingly insurmountable obstacles emerge, such as unattainable energy requirements or the need for exotic matter. Thus if success is to be achieved, it must rest on some yet unforeseen breakthrough about which we can only speculate, such as a technology to cohere otherwise random vacuum fluctuations. Nonetheless, the possibility of reduced-time interstellar travel by advanced extraterrestrial (ET) civilizations is not, as naive consideration might hold, fundamentally ruled out by presently known physical principles. ET knowledge of the physical universe may comprise new principles which allow some form of FTL travel. This possibility is to be taken seriously, since the average age of suitable stars within the ‘galactic habitable zone’ in which the Earth also resides, is found to be about 109 years older than the Sun…
Is the answer to the Fermi paradox, then, that we are even now being visited by extraterrestrial spacecraft whose contact strategy is based on a sense of interstellar ethics we do not yet understand? The paper argues that such visitations must be considered more likely than a ‘we are alone’ answer to the Fermi question, and goes on to consider what ethical considerations might motivate a culture investigating our planet from outside Earth. The paper is Deardorff, Haisch, Maccabee and Puthoff, “Inflation-Theory Implications for Extraterrestrial Visitation,” in the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society Vol. 58, No. 1/2 (January/February 2005), pp. 43-50.
I’ve never understood why some people say that because there are stars older than the Sun civilizations on any habitable planet orbiting one of those stars are going to be older than ours and therefore that much more advanced and therefore if they exist and if FTL is possible they should already have contacted or conquered us.
The lack of logic in that argument should be obvious. Human civilization has been neither unified nor continuous, why should an extraterrestrial one be? Moreover, civilizations advance at different rates according to local resources. It’s more like Zeno’s Paradox rather than Fermi’s.
matt i agree with you above there is no cogent logical reason to believe these things.one more sidelight,how about intelligent humanoid (or any other type i suppose) societies that have so far only developed to a point where their technology is considerably less than even ours! thank you your friend george
Empirical evidences in favor of a varying-speed-of-light
Authors: Yves-Henri Sanejouand
(Submitted on 3 Aug 2009 (v1), last revised 17 Aug 2009 (this version, v2))
Abstract: The empirical evidences in favor of the hypothesis that the speed of light decreases by a few centimeters per second each year are examined. Lunar laser ranging data are found to be consistent with this hypothesis, which also provides a straightforward explanation for the so-called Pioneer anomaly, that is, a time-dependent blue-shift observed when analyzing radio tracking data from distant spacecrafts, as well as an alternative explanation for both the apparent time-dilation of remote events and the apparent acceleration of the Universe.
The main argument against this hypothesis, namely, the constancy of fine-structure and Rydberg constants, is discussed. Both of them being combinations of several physical constants, their constancy imply that, if the speed of light is indeed time-dependent, then at least two other “fundamental constants” have to vary as well. This sets strong constraints which will have to be fulfilled in future varying-speed-of-light theories.
Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures, 1 table
Subjects: General Physics (physics.gen-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:0908.0249v2 [physics.gen-ph]
Submission history
From: Yves-Henri Sanejouand [view email]
[v1] Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:46:38 GMT (46kb)
[v2] Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:41:37 GMT (47kb)
http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0249