You can blame H. G. Wells' The Time Machine for my interest in the Earth's far future. That swollen red Sun at the end of the novel created vivid 'end of the world' scenarios for me as a boy, and later I would learn that outer planets or moons around a G-class star might turn habitable once it became a red giant. But it would only be in the last few years that I learned how robust the investigations into white dwarf systems -- the fate of a red giant -- have become, and now we're finding out not only that such stars can retain planets, but can conceivably create new ones through an emerging disk packed with the pulverized dust of remnant materials like asteroids. Image: This artist's concept shows a white dwarf debris disk. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech. Jordan Steckloff (Planetary Science Institute, Tucson) has just published a short paper on the matter, looking at how white dwarf debris disks emerge. The disks seem to form only after ten to twenty million years following the end of the...

Back in the 1990s, when the first exoplanet detections were made, the best possible targets for radial velocity searches were what we now call 'hot Jupiters.' Radial velocity looks at the Doppler shift of light as a star moves first towards us, then away, tugged by the invisible planet. A massive Jupiter in a tight orbit tugged maximally, and quite often, because its orbit could be measured in mere days or weeks. It was purely selection effect, but it seemed that such planets were common, until we began to discover just how many other kinds of worlds were out there. Outer-system Jupiters like ours are a different problem. A gas giant in a multi-year orbit produces a radial velocity signature that is far smaller and dependent upon long analysis. Thus, early numbers on the existence of gas giants in the Jupiter or Saturn class and similarly far from their host star are just beginning to emerge as exoplanet science matures. We'll be learning more -- a lot more -- but tentative findings...

Laboratory work on Earth is, as we saw yesterday, leading to hypotheses about how planets form and the effect of these processes on subsequent life. Whether in our own outer Solar System or orbiting other stars, planets in the 'ice giant' category, like Uranus and Neptune, remain mysterious, with Voyager 2's flybys of the latter the only missions that have gone near them. We also know that sub-Neptune planets are common, many of these doubtless sharing the characteristics of their larger namesake. Thus recent experiments probing ice giant interiors catch my eye this morning. Involving an international team of collaborators, the work looks at the interactions between water and rock that we would expect to find in the extreme conditions inside an ice giant. Planets like Uranus and Neptune are thought to house most of their mass in a deep water layer, a dense fluid overlaying a rocky core, a sharp departure from terrestrial worlds. What happens at that interface is ripe for examination....

While a planet's position in the habitable zone is thought critical for the development of life like ourselves, new work out of Rice University suggests an equally significant factor in planetary growth. Working at a high-pressure laboratory at the university, Damanveer Grewal and Rajdeep Dasgupta have explored how planets capture and retain key volatiles like nitrogen, carbon and water as they form The team used nitrogen as a proxy for volatile distribution in a range of simulated protoplanets. Two processes are under study here, the first being the accretion of material in the circumstellar disk into a protoplanet, and the rate at which it proceeds. The second is differentiation, as the protoplanet separates into layers ranging from a metallic core to a silicate shell and, finally, an atmospheric envelope. The interplay between these processes is found to determine which volatiles the subsequent planet retains. Most of the nitrogen is found to escape into the atmosphere during...

Is there any chance we may one day find technosignatures around the nearest stars? If we were to detect such, on a planet, say, orbiting Alpha Centauri B, that would seem to indicate that civilizations are to be found around a high percentage of G- and K-class stars. Brian Lacki (UC-Berkeley) examined the question from all angles at the recent Breakthrough Discuss, raising some interesting issues about the implications of technosignatures, and the assumptions we bring to the search for them. We’re starting to consider a wide range of technosignatures rather than just focusing on Dysonian shells around entire stars. Other kinds of megastructure are possible, some perhaps so exotic we wouldn’t be sure how they operated or what they were for. Atmospheres could throw technosignatures by revealing industrial activity along with their potential biosignatures. We could conceivably detect power beaming directed at interstellar spacecraft or even an infrastructure within a particular stellar...

In the ranks of exoplanets we can actually see, we can include the gas giant PDS 70b, a young world orbiting the K-dwarf PDS 70. Bear in mind that of the more than 4,000 exoplanets thus far catalogued, only about 15 have been directly imaged, an indication of how tricky this work is and how far we have to go as we contemplate imaging Earth-size planets and taking spectroscopic measurements of their atmospheres. The most recent PDS 70b work was performed with the Hubble instrument, and is to my knowledge the first direct detection of an exoplanet in the ultraviolet. About 370 light years from Earth, PDS 70 (also known as V1032 Centauri) is a T Tauri star, a class of variables less than 10 million years old; this one appears to be no more than 5 million years old, and its largest planet is still in the process of building mass. The star is known to host at least two actively forming planets within its circumstellar disk of gas and dust, although only the larger is apparent in these UV...

Because we've just looked at how a carbon cycle like Earth's may play out to allow habitability on other worlds, today's paper seems a natural segue. It involves geology and planet formation, though here we're less concerned with plate tectonics and feedback mechanisms than the composition of a planet's mantle. At the University of British Columbia - Okanagan, Brendan Dyck argues that the presence of iron is more important than a planet's location in the habitable zone in predicting habitability. We learn that planetary mantles become increasingly iron-rich with proximity to the snow-line. In the Solar System, Mercury, Earth and Mars show silicate-mantle iron content that increases with distance from the Sun. Each planet had different proportions of iron entering its core during the planet formation period. The differences between them are the result of how much of their iron is contained in the mantle versus the core, for each should have the same proportion of iron as the star they...

Earth's long-term carbon cycle is significant for life because it keeps carbon in transition, rather than allowing it to accumulate in its entirety in the atmosphere, or become completely absorbed in carbonate rocks. The feedback mechanism works over geological timescales to allow stable temperatures as CO2 cycles between Earth's mantle and the surface. As a result, we have carbon everywhere. 65,500 billion metric tons stored in rock complements the carbon found in the atmosphere and the oceans, as well as in surface features including vegetation and soil. It's a long-term cycle that can vary in the short term but be stabilizing over geological time-frames. The Sun has increased in luminosity substantially since Earth's formation, but the long-term carbon cycle is thought to be the key to maintaining temperatures on the surface suitable for life. Does it exist on other planets? It's an open question, as astronomer Mark Oosterloo (University of Groningen, The Netherlands) points out:...

Why the renewed focus on astrometry when it comes to Alpha Centauri (a theme we saw as well in the previous post on ALMA observations from the surface)? One problem we face with other detection methods is simply statistical: We can study planets, as via the Kepler mission, by their transits, but if we want to know about specific stars that are near us, we can’t assume a lucky alignment. Radial velocity requires no transits, but has yet to be pushed to the level of detecting Earth-mass planets at habitable-zone distances from stars like our own. This is why imaging is now very much in the mix, as is astrometry, and getting the latter into space in a dedicated mission has occupied a team at the University of Sydney led by Peter Tuthill for a number of years -- I remember hearing Tuthill describe the technology at Breakthrough Discuss in 2016. Out of this effort we get a concept called TOLIMAN, a space telescope that draws its title from Alpha Centauri B, whose medieval name in Arabic,...

When it comes to finding planets around Centauri A and B, the method that most intrigues me is astrometry. At the recent Breakthrough Discuss sessions, Rachel Akeson (Caltech/IPAC) made the case for using the technique with data from the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA). My interest is piqued by the fact that so few of the more than 4300 known exoplanets have been discovered using astrometry, although astronomers were able in 2002 to characterize the previously known Gliese 876 using the method. Before that, numerous reported detections of planets around other stars, some going back to the 18th Century, have proven to be incorrect. But we’re entering a new era. ESA’s Gaia mission, launched in 2013, is likely to return a large horde of planets using astrometry as it creates a three-dimensional map of star movement in the Milky Way. Dr. Akeson’s case for using ALMA to make detections on the ground is robust, despite the challenges the method presents. She points out that if we...